Most of the current articles on innovative talent management are from the perspective of the bystander, theoretical analysis, lack of management and implementation from the perspective of the problem, many suggestions seem to be good, but are difficult to implement.
Innovative talent training is a very practical project.If you only take a linear implementation plan, for example, when all the plans are designed and then implemented, it is estimated that the yellow cabbage is cold.I prefer to improve the promotion model while doing it, but not too aggressive under a safer and more reasonable execution strategy.
The biggest challenge in training innovative talents comes from two points: long time periods and difficult to evaluate, and high demand for resource matching.
The so-called ten years of wood cultivation, a hundred years of education.People live to learn old, the core capabilities required are very much, and innovation is actually only one of them.The reason why it is currently proposed separately to strengthen the cultivation of this direction is related to the current development trend.There is a law of economic development that gradually changes from material accumulation to innovation.The wealth we perceive has changed from simple material wealth to a system.Primary material wealth accounts for only a fraction, if not a small, of the wealth of its final market.Design, production, packaging, logistics, marketing, after-sales service, etc. form a chain, and wealth exists in the entire chain.The ultimate goal of the so-called innovative thinking is to maximize the contribution of the non-material wealth part of the chain and turn innovative ideas into wealth.It can be seen that whoever has the ability to innovate can have a greater voice and dominate the entire distribution of wealth.For a nation, this is a crucial event and a commanding high point in future national competition.
It is precisely because innovative thinking involves the entire industry chain that the difficulty of cultivating is also here.Innovation requires capabilities that are therefore multifaceted and difficult to achieve in a short time.Compared with traditional education, the resources required for innovative education are also more prominent.Because to innovate, to face the real test of the market, we must have a certain spirit of real war and education, and paper talk will certainly not work.
Because of the purpose and attributes of innovation, innovation education is more or less connected to the business model from the beginning.Innovation model training is to train future scientists and businessmen who combine industry and research, and it is rarely mentioned to train specialized scientists with innovative thinking.Because the latter has its own innovative properties, it does not need to be specially cultivated.It is also true that the target group for innovative talent training is undergraduate students, most of whom are graduate students who have just started research, and doctoral students and above are excluded.
As an executive of the innovation talent training project, how to effectively carry out the innovation talent training under the premise of taking full account of the above-mentioned long cycle, complexity and resource consumption?
Specifically, the first thing to overcome is the content and form.
Harmonious unity of content and form.In general, the content determines the form, and the form gives back to the content.Overall, the content is dominant.But for the complex system of innovative talent education, content is a heavy burden.The essence of innovative education lies in the variety of forms, different people have different characteristics, according to the characteristics of education.Of course, this is impossible for teachers and resources to implement, especially in the early days of the founding, when there is a lack of manpower and resources, it is impossible to achieve such an effect.
Second, form becomes important.In order to distinguish it from traditional education and reflect the mode and essence of innovative education, the teaching form itself must have innovative effect.The best way is to do the opposite of the traditional education model, and the worst way is to make a clear difference.Although some use form to counteract the taste of content, this is also a practical model.
What we really need to pay attention to is formalism.In the beginning of form, if the executor really only believes that form is omnipotent, after a good form of form, without keeping up with the content of the pavement, it becomes formalism, which is fatal to talent innovation and cultivation.
There are often such contradictions in implementation.People who believe in the power of traditional education models cannot change their minds to design innovative education.As a result, people who design innovative educational models may not have a real systematic experience of undergraduate education.If this contradiction is not resolved from the beginning, it will bring great disadvantages to subsequent program innovation and iteration.
The second challenge facing the executor is how to evaluate and reflect the training effect of innovative talents.This problem is more difficult than the first one.Expectations cannot be judged, so it is necessary to circumvent such soul questions from the point of view of execution.
In the concrete implementation, there will be two situations, the first is the strong link between innovation education and entrepreneurship.The goal of innovative education is to train the next generation of Ma Yun, Ma Huateng and other types of characters.For such a project, the best way is to take the elimination method, there are always some people with similar qualities, in a small direction to start a successful business.
The second is to cultivate innovative talents in the general sense, with the market as a guide and entrepreneurship as a weak link.This can be considered an upgraded version of the general university.Strict entry and exit is a very appropriate strategy.As long as the background of the students recruited is strong enough, it is not easy to estimate which training method to use.The effect of cultivation is also very bright, which is enough.If this is the only way of thinking, it is not beneficial to innovators.In practice, the executor must take the initiative to think about how to evaluate the effectiveness of the new education system, which outsiders can't really understand.It is the responsibility of the executive to summarize a set of approaches and modalities that can be evaluated in such a way as to convince people to take it orally.And this evaluation method itself is an innovation of innovation education, which is of great significance.The so-called leniency should reduce the cost of failure of students participating in such education.Participating in innovative educational experiments is inherently risky and should be respected by both teachers and students.Therefore, broadening is a more compromising and feasible solution.
The third hurdle encountered in innovative education is the problem of resources.Either increase the numerator or decrease the denominator.Social investment is indispensable, its own blood transfusion function should be established, controlling the appropriate number of students and teachers is the key, grafting to other universities is also a countermeasure.This is a very high requirement for teachers, at least multi-faceted, with a minimum number of teachers to cover the most research areas, and the traditional department structure seems out of place, understaffed, and unable to meet the requirements of the Ministry of Education.
In general, innovative education has just begun in the country, and there is no systematic book on the implementation level of innovative education on the market, and everyone is crossing the river with a rock.Emotionally speaking, I began by showing that I have a lot of respect for the executors of innovative education, and that doing it is better than not doing it.Those who dare to eat crabs are brave people.We need to understand the difficulties faced by these implementers, do not always use colored glasses to nitpick, but the sound advice should be expressed, only in this way can the innovative education system be gradually upgraded and perfected.
For innovation educators, we must know that Chengcai is a long-term training process, and we can't think that we can achieve this goal with four years of undergraduate study, which is unrealistic and puts a lot of pressure on ourselves.
Writing as if I were in the wrong place, the innovation educator said to me, "If you know everything, you can do it!”
My end is also gray quickly slip away, I will practice, I can not.