College Students' evaluation of teachers or teaching evaluation is a process of university teaching management and supervision. Universities at home and abroad are doing it, and foreign universities also take students' evaluation of teachers as a reference for teachers to promote their professional titles. No wonder foreign professors often give chocolate or candy to students who answer questions in class. One is to encourage or reward their answers to questions, The second is to win the hearts of students and give teachers a good evaluation.

First of all, what is the purpose of College Students' evaluation of teachers? According to the practice of most universities, it is to supervise teachers and urge teachers to speak well. There is no better way for students to evaluate teachers. Just like consumers' evaluation of purchased goods, only consumers have more say. However, most college students' evaluation of teachers is carried out after the teachers have finished all the courses, which is a hindsight. Since evaluating the teacher is to urge the teacher to improve the teaching methods and improve the teaching effect, what is the use of evaluation after the class is finished? You can't tell these evaluated students again! So this evaluation is just an evaluation for the teacher. The teacher doesn't know what the students want the teacher to say. What is the appetite of these students? According to the control theory, this is an open-loop control without feedback and can not be corrected in time. Therefore, such evaluation of teaching is suspected of formalism, which can not really solve the problem. It also teaches individual students to do tricks behind their backs and even retaliate against teachers, which can not stimulate students' enthusiasm for evaluation of teaching.

Since this is a post evaluation, there is no direct benefit to the evaluated students, so it doesn't matter to the students. Since I am forced to evaluate the teacher, I will make a hasty evaluation. The evaluation is lack of impartiality.

The correct and reasonable way to evaluate the teacher is to evaluate the teacher in the process of class. For example, two or three weeks after the teacher's class, the students give an evaluation of the teacher's lecture methods and effects, directly point out the existing problems and desired effects, and the teacher makes appropriate adjustments according to the students' evaluation to meet the students' requirements. For example, some teachers like to drag the class, It's time to finish class. If you don't finish class, you will continue to talk for a few minutes, which makes you more professional. But the students are hungry and want to eat the food in the canteen. After the students put forward it, the teacher will improve it.

Secondly, students' evaluation of teachers can be carried out face-to-face, which is called face-to-face listening to the voice of the "grass-roots level"! Face to face has many advantages. Teachers and students love father and son (mother and son). What can't they say clearly? Do you have to evaluate behind the scenes? Face to face evaluation not only enhances the feelings between students and teachers, but also strengthens the communication between students and teachers, exercises the communication ability between students and people, especially the speaking methods and skills to put forward improvement suggestions, but also cultivates the comprehensive quality of students. The students we train should be open, not long.

Finally, most universities use formatted evaluation methods to ask students to fill in "yes" or "no" or give scores, such as "is there passion in the teacher's lecture?", "is the teacher's lecture voice loud?", "is the teacher's lecture inspired?" and so on. This is not only a lazy evaluation method, but also a passive evaluation method, but also a kind of disrespect for students and teachers. A person's strengths and weaknesses can not be summarized by a few or dozens of questions. Everyone has his own unique place, and everyone also has his own unique understanding and views. Some teachers may attract some students with one action, one smile, one mantra or a unique accent, so as to improve the students' listening effect. Correct and reasonable evaluation should be to let students evaluate teachers with their own comments. Don't our teachers often write comments to students? Only the language from one's own heart and soul can truly express the students' true feelings - the feelings for the teacher. A cold "yes", "no" or a number is the suppression and desecration of feelings. Over time, it will affect one's psychology, make people heartless and treat people like things.

Comments and even essays can be used to evaluate teachers online and anonymously. Each comment or essay can be sent to teachers to let teachers know the students' evaluation and respond, so as to improve and improve the teaching effect and meet the students' requirements as much as possible. This is the interaction between teaching and learning, the expression of true feelings and the friendship between teachers and students, Is the normal cultivation of personality.

Universities can also hold exhibitions of students' teaching evaluation, and display good (sincere and true) comments or teaching evaluation essays written by students to teachers. Teachers can also learn from each other, promote and progress each other.