Recently, fan yunnian's "monographs can be written better and read better" and Dr. Ye Jianjun's "viewing our language education from the experience of guiding Postgraduates' thesis writing" both talked about the writing of scholars or postgraduates. I agree with you very much. What I don't agree with is Dr. Ye's analysis of the cause of the problem: the time allocated for Chinese education is not enough, which is largely occupied by English.

Although English education takes a lot of time and the effect is questionable, there is no direct causal relationship between them and students' poor writing. In my opinion, the problem is the way we teach writing. There are process and evaluation criteria. The problem of writing process is that our country's writing education does not attach importance to revision. In our country, the writing education of primary and secondary schools is exam oriented, and there are few opportunities for students to revise in the exam oriented process. Therefore, in teaching, teachers rarely ask students to revise, so that students do not know the simple way that good works are revised when they reach the university or even graduate stage Li. So I will tell students in the writing class: if you submit a work without careful revision, it is equivalent to going on a blind date in your pajamas.

The second major problem of writing teaching in China is the evaluation standard. In our evaluation of students' writing, whether the rhetoric is beautiful or not accounts for a large proportion of these superficial things, regardless of the readers' reading experience. In a word, we don't value the audience awareness. I remember Professor Rao Yi once talked about how he learned this kind of audience awareness in the United States, which was of great help to his academic exchanges. In our writing teaching, we should pay more attention to rhetoric and other appearances to the purpose of writing and readers' feelings. Otherwise, even if all English classes are replaced by Chinese writing class, there will be no change.